PDA

View Full Version : ARARAT SWEEPS THE 'GENIES'; WINS FIVE 'CANADIAN OSCAR AWARDS


SaSSoun
02-16-2003, 11:25 PM
-- Egoyan's Treatment of the Armenian Genocide is Named Best Film;
Khanjian and Koteas are Honored for their Roles

TORONTO, CANADA - Renowned Director Atom Egoyan's "Ararat," which
explores the ongoing impact of the Turkish government's denial of
the Armenian Genocide, was honored as the best Canadian feature
film of 2002 at the "Genie" awards ceremony held last night.

In addition to best film, "Ararat" won awards in four additional
categories, best actress, Arsinee Khanjian; best supporting actor
Elias Koteas; best original score, Mychael Danna, and; best costume
design, Beth Pasternak.

In a statement issued earlier today, the Armenian National
Committee of Canada extended its "profound congratulations to the
five winners of last night's Genie Awards. . . The importance of
this long overdue film, critical as it is of Turkey's longstanding
denial of its own history, cannot be overstated. Director Atom
Egoyan has directed not only a remarkably intricate character
study, but has managed to do so by exposing the inherent problems
and consequences of genocide denial, which are still very relevant
today."

Accepting the best picture award in Egoyan's absence, "Ararat"
producer Robert Lantos explained that, "Four years ago, I
challenged Atom to make a film about the tragic story of his
people, the Armenians. And I said if he did, I would stand by
him." Egoyan was unable to be present at the award ceremony
because he is serving on the jury at the Berlin Film Festival.

Best actress winner Arsinee Khanjian, who hosted the "Genie"
Awards, commented on her victory, noting, "With my work on
'Ararat,' I wanted to honor the spirit of my ancestors." She then
thanked her husband, Egoyan, - "without whom I might have become a
politician," she laughed - before finishing her speech in Armenian.

Having made its world-premiere at the Cannes Film Festival in May
of 2002, "Ararat" is described as Egoyan's most powerful film to
date, weaving the tale of the estranged members of a contemporary
Armenian family faced both with Turkey's denial of the Armenian
Genocide and with their own complicated lives. The film initially
opened in Los Angeles and New York theaters on November 15th and
continues to be seen in cities across North America.

As part of their efforts to generate nation-wide awareness of the
film, the ANCA's regional offices and local chapters organized a
grassroots campaign to encourage Armenian Americans to "Take a
Friend to Ararat." In a recent interview with Canada's "Horizon
Weekly" correspondent Aris Babikian, Director Atom Egoyan stressed
the importance of these grassroots efforts to the success of the
film, noting "I can't underestimate the crucial role that the
Armenian community played at that point through the "Take a Friend
to Ararat" program and through the Action Alert notices... That
opening weekend [in Los Angeles and New York] was historic. We had
a higher per-screen-average than 'Harry Potter.' That is
remarkable. I think the campaign was able to facilitate wider
distribution and continued to manifest the passion [Miramax Co-
Chairman] Harvey [Weinstein] felt."

In October of last year, the ANCA cosponsored, along with the
Armenian Assembly, a Congressional Armenian Caucus screening of the
film at the Library of Congress for U.S. Representatives and
Senators.

Lilya
02-17-2003, 07:10 PM
yep, very very good news... but too bad it didn't generate anything big in the US. True alot of people went to the premier, including non Armenians here in New York ( i dont know about California). But the general population hasen't even heard about the movie.. :( it really was a long overdo film exposing Turkish crimes, but i just wish more people here would be interested in seeing it....

SaSSoun
02-20-2003, 01:47 PM
Poor Advertising, no promoting, etc etc the list goes on.

Anonymouse
02-20-2003, 03:32 PM
That's because the entertainment industry is a xxxish pastime and how dare anything but the Holocaust take center stage.

Lilya
02-20-2003, 04:05 PM
not only how dare anything but the holocaust take centerstage, but how dare the Armenian Genocide be put in comparison with the holocaust.

maraleeg
04-21-2003, 09:28 PM
ok my opinion of that movie is that it SUCKED i thought it was gonna b solely based on the genocide but the genocide was kinda left in the background i think it was distasteful and couldve been done a bit better... i also think its da first big armo movie made so i guess for now its fine but i hope to see better cuz i didnt really think much of it :rolleyes:

sSsflamesSs
04-21-2003, 11:29 PM
I could say that I was also disappointed in how the Genocide was portrayed in the movie. Although the movie addresses such a grave tragedy that may be shocking when shown in it's full light, the movie was bombarded with unnecessary plots that took away from the whole point of the movie. Needless to say, this is a first attempt, so it should be praised for its efforts. Better films have yet to come.

Chichu
04-22-2003, 07:36 AM
"Ararat" is in fact a poor one. Egoyan tried playing with the "stream of consciousness" (which is his "style", if you've seen his other films) and basically fails at it. I dont think that focusing only on the Genocide would be a good way to solve the problem (although focusing on one thing instead of 6-7 would be a good idea! :) ), because that way the so called target audience would shrink even more. But focusing steadily on Archil Gorky, with the Genocide playing a consistent role (as it did in the artist's life), a very comprehencible and worthy film could be made. Nevertheless, Egoyan is just exprerimenting with this "stream of consciousness" technique, as I said. What we are concerned about is why he allowed himself to experiment when such an issue as the Armenian Genocide is at stake.[/u]

jahannam
05-13-2003, 04:19 PM
"Ararat" is in fact a poor one. Egoyan tried playing with the "stream of consciousness" (which is his "style", if you've seen his other films) and basically fails at it. I dont think that focusing only on the Genocide would be a good way to solve the problem (although focusing on one thing instead of 6-7 would be a good idea! :) ), because that way the so called target audience would shrink even more. But focusing steadily on Archil Gorky, with the Genocide playing a consistent role (as it did in the artist's life), a very comprehencible and worthy film could be made. Nevertheless, Egoyan is just exprerimenting with this "stream of consciousness" technique, as I said. What we are concerned about is why he allowed himself to experiment when such an issue as the Armenian Genocide is at stake.[/u]

all I heard was blah blah .....blah blah blah.... blah blah...
is this why you're sitting at home watching TV... and Miramax is paying Egoyan to make films? lol
"fails at it"? I thought this thread was about the awards this film has been achieving...
it's all good...
hating smart asses is just too much work, I just ignore them...

Anonymouse
05-15-2003, 07:41 PM
Fear that lady!

Arshak1946
08-27-2003, 06:41 PM
-- Egoyan's Treatment of the Armenian Genocide is Named Best Film;
Khanjian and Koteas are Honored for their Roles

TORONTO, CANADA - Renowned Director Atom Egoyan's "Ararat," which
explores the ongoing impact of the Turkish government's denial of
the Armenian Genocide, was honored as the best Canadian feature
film of 2002 at the "Genie" awards ceremony held last night.

In addition to best film, "Ararat" won awards in four additional
categories, best actress, Arsinee Khanjian; best supporting actor
Elias Koteas; best original score, Mychael Danna, and; best costume
design, Beth Pasternak.

In a statement issued earlier today, the Armenian National
Committee of Canada extended its "profound congratulations to the
five winners of last night's Genie Awards. . . The importance of
this long overdue film, critical as it is of Turkey's longstanding
denial of its own history, cannot be overstated. Director Atom
Egoyan has directed not only a remarkably intricate character
study, but has managed to do so by exposing the inherent problems
and consequences of genocide denial, which are still very relevant
today."

Accepting the best picture award in Egoyan's absence, "Ararat"
producer Robert Lantos explained that, "Four years ago, I
challenged Atom to make a film about the tragic story of his
people, the Armenians. And I said if he did, I would stand by
him." Egoyan was unable to be present at the award ceremony
because he is serving on the jury at the Berlin Film Festival.

Best actress winner Arsinee Khanjian, who hosted the "Genie"
Awards, commented on her victory, noting, "With my work on
'Ararat,' I wanted to honor the spirit of my ancestors." She then
thanked her husband, Egoyan, - "without whom I might have become a
politician," she laughed - before finishing her speech in Armenian.

Having made its world-premiere at the Cannes Film Festival in May
of 2002, "Ararat" is described as Egoyan's most powerful film to
date, weaving the tale of the estranged members of a contemporary
Armenian family faced both with Turkey's denial of the Armenian
Genocide and with their own complicated lives. The film initially
opened in Los Angeles and New York theaters on November 15th and
continues to be seen in cities across North America.

As part of their efforts to generate nation-wide awareness of the
film, the ANCA's regional offices and local chapters organized a
grassroots campaign to encourage Armenian Americans to "Take a
Friend to Ararat." In a recent interview with Canada's "Horizon
Weekly" correspondent Aris Babikian, Director Atom Egoyan stressed
the importance of these grassroots efforts to the success of the
film, noting "I can't underestimate the crucial role that the
Armenian community played at that point through the "Take a Friend
to Ararat" program and through the Action Alert notices... That
opening weekend was historic. We had
a higher per-screen-average than 'Harry Potter.' That is
remarkable. I think the campaign was able to facilitate wider
distribution and continued to manifest the passion [Miramax Co-
Chairman] Harvey [Weinstein] felt."

In October of last year, the ANCA cosponsored, along with the
Armenian Assembly, a Congressional Armenian Caucus screening of the
film at the Library of Congress for U.S. Representatives and
Senators.[i]
Hello:
This film is great. When opened in New York , I went to see five times, what a detailed movie, film inside the film, got to watch and listen every moment to really understand what the movie giving to us.
Now I have the ARARAT movie in DVD, watching now every day. I will keep this treasury rest of my life. If you interest to locate the web site to purchase drop a line in Armenian Clup Forum.
Best Regards To All.

TigranJamharian
08-28-2003, 09:07 AM
Although I give credit to Egoyan for finally making a movie about the Genocide i dont think that his only job was to make a "smart" movie i also think he should have made an effort to make a movie that was more marketable because 95% of the people who went to see that movie were Armenians and we already know about the genocide. i think he should have put his chracteristic indie film style aside and try to make something that miramax could have marketed and non-Armenians would have gone in to see. the aim is to educate the world about the genocide not to make something that has only one copy in blockbuster and isnt even on dtv pay perview. anyway yes he made the movie and it was definately better than nothing but i am also surprised that he didnt make this movie earlier. what we need now is to make a movie of the 40 days of musa dagh, which was one of the best books i have ever read and which i think given a budget of about 45million could be turned into an excellent movie that would make a hell of a lot of money with its world war1 era combat and the underdogs fighting against an overwhelming force tand winning against all odds. Come ON Steven Spielberg make the damn movie!

xBaron Dants
08-28-2003, 08:18 PM
We couldn't have expected Egoyan to make a Schindler's list type of movie because it's not his style, and he is, after all, an artist that has to remain true to his ways. I do agree that we need a more "historical" or "blockbuster" type of movie though, and if Spielberg could make it, all the better.

patlajan
08-28-2003, 08:44 PM
I agree. I doubt the averge peson in the U.S. knew who William Wallace was before Braveheart came out.